BMC Health Services Research

Objectives: Women's empowerment is a key determinant of health and well-being and may shape how women access and benefit from publicly-funded health insurance (PFHI). We aimed to examine whether different levels of women's empowerment were associated with 1) verification in India's PFHI Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PM-JAY), 2) outpatient care utilization, and 3) resultant out-of-pocket expenditure. Design: We conducted a cross-sectional observational study. We analyzed data from a household survey, created a composite empowerment index using structural equation models, and used multivariate regression models to test associations between women's empowerment and the outcome variables. Setting: The study was conducted between December 2019 and February 2020 among PM-JAY eligible households in six Indian states (Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Meghalaya, Tamil Nadu, and Uttar Pradesh). Participants: 14,378 women across the six states. Results: Three main findings emerged: First, high levels of women's empowerment were associated with higher odds of completing PM-JAY verification (AOR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.09-1.36). Second, women's empowerment was not associated with outpatient service utilization. And third, either medium levels of empowerment (coef = -0.49, p = 0.020) or PM-JAY verification (coef = -0.37, p = 0.034) was associated with lower OOPE for outpatient services. Women who had both, PM-JAY verification and medium levels of empowerment, experienced higher OOPE (coef = 0.45, p = 0.058). Conclusions: Women's empowerment is an important factor related with PM-JAY verification, but not with outpatient service use. OOPE varied depending on whether women were both empowered and PM-JAY verified or not. Our results suggest that institutional and structural barriers may play a greater role in healthcare access than individual factors pertaining to empowerment alone. Achieving equitable access therefore requires gender-responsive systems that reduce administrative barriers and support women in navigating the healthcare pathway. Our findings highlight the importance of integrating outpatient care into PM-JAY to increase financial protection, streamlining verification processes to improve women's engagement with PM-JAY and the broader health system, and advancing health financing reforms that better support women.

Abstract Background: In Pakistan approximately 7 million people were living with diabetes in 2014. To address the burden of diabetes, a randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a standardized care package in improving diabetes outcomes in health care settings of Punjab, Pakistan. A costing study was embedded within this RCT to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the standardized diabetes care package in improving diabetes outcomes. Methods: 166 patients were recruited for the costing study from 14 public health clusters in Sargodha district of Pakistan. Analyses was conducted using the societal perspective, broader societal perspective and sensitivity analyses to explore the uncertainty in analyses. Data was analysed for both 166 participants enrolled in costing study and for the 495 participants recruited in the cRCT, using multiple amputations. Results: Using the societal perspective, standardized diabetes care package was found to be cost-effective as compared to the standardized care and was cost saving as the costs in the intervention arm were lower than those in the control arm whereas greater effects were demonstrated in the intervention arm. As per the broader societal perspective and the healthcare perspective only, the standardized care package was not proven to be cost-effective. Keywords: Diabetes management, health services cost, out of pocket cost, cost-effectiveness.

Background: Lean Healthcare has been adopted as an approach to reducing waste, enhancing process efficiency, and optimizing clinical and administrative workflows. However, empirical evaluations aimed at establishing a causal relationship between Lean Healthcare interventions and outcomes remain limited. This evidence gap is particularly pronounced in the context of large-scale implementations in low- and middle-income countries, where more efficient allocation could yield substantial improvements in population health. Methods: We conducted an impact evaluation study employing a staggered difference-in-differences approach to estimate the effects of the Lean Healthcare in Emergency Departments (ED) initiative in the Brazilian context. The intervention was implemented between January 2017 and December 2025 across 309 hospitals. We analyzed hospital-level indicators of the number of hospitalizations and the average length of stay (in days) among patients admitted through urgent or emergency pathways. Results: Our estimates suggest that the intervention was associated with an average increase of 38.6 admissions per hospital per month (p = 0.033), corresponding to approximately a 5.9% increase relative to the monthly admission volume. We also observed a reduction of 0.184 days in the average length of stay (p = 0.058), equivalent to an approximately 3.0% decrease in hospitalization time. These effects exhibited distinct temporal dynamics: the effect on the number of hospitalizations emerged gradually and increased with the duration of the intervention, whereas the reduction in length of stay became evident earlier. Conclusion: This study provides evidence of a causal effect of Lean Healthcare implementation in emergency departments on operational performance. The simultaneous increase in admissions and reduction in length of stay suggests improved bed productivity and effective capacity without expanding physical infrastructure. These findings support the use of flow-management methodologies as an effective strategy for mitigating emergency department overcrowding while increasing service capacity.

IntroductionUsing an open enrollment process in 2023, California funded 28 emergency departments (EDs) to implement or expand HIV and syphilis screening programs. Californias 2026 state budget now commits an additional $60 million, over six years, to renew support for this screening. How renewed funds are allocated will determine which communities they reach. This analysis establishes a framework derived from public information to simulate and compare several funding strategies, highlighting the tradeoffs across disease burden, geographic reach, and social vulnerability. MethodsPublicly available data were used to construct ED-level profiles for the 282 EDs in the 35 California counties with populations exceeding 100,000. Profiles were then linked to corresponding HIV and syphilis burden (z-score), measures of social vulnerability for the surrounding service area , and socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of the population each ED serves. At a 28 ED award scale, allocation strategies (random selection, prior 2023 awardees, federal priority-county targeting, ranking on burden alone, and a composite of burden, vulnerability, and visit volume) were then compared, simulating ED participation across 100,000 Monte Carlo draws at 70% participation. Sensitivity analyses included varied (50% and 90%) participation and a larger (n=64) ED award scale. Analyses were conducted in 2026. ResultsNo single strategy performed best. Ranking on burden alone reached the highest mean county burden but only 4 of 35 counties, whereas a composite approach reached 8 counties, the highest social vulnerability, and the largest share of patients who identified as Hispanic. Every targeted strategy performed better than both random selection and the prior 2023 awardees on burden but reached fewer counties than either. In sensitivity analyses, the tradeoffs between burden and reach persisted across participation rates and at the 64-ED scale.

Background: Patient satisfaction is a key measure of healthcare quality among people experiencing homelessness. Student-run free clinics (SRFCs) provide care to underserved populations, but the role of student involvement in patient satisfaction remains unclear. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients receiving care at an SRFC. From February 2024 to February 2025, patients completed post-visit surveys assessing satisfaction that were evaluated using regression analyses. Results: Eighty-eight patients completed surveys, reporting high overall satisfaction (mean 9.26/10). In separate linear regression models adjusted for age, gender, and race, greater perceived benefit of student involvement was associated with higher satisfaction ({beta} = .298, p = .037), whereas perceiving the visit as too long was associated with lower satisfaction ({beta} = -.285, p = .019). Conclusion: Greater perceived benefit of student involvement was associated with higher patient satisfaction, whereas longer perceived visit duration was associated with lower satisfaction. These findings highlight the importance of balancing educational opportunities with efficient workflows in SRFCs.

Background: While health system costs of COVID-19 are well documented, evidence on out-of-pocket costs to patients and families, including non-medical and time burden, is limited. This study aimed to estimate out-of-pocket medical, non-medical, and time burden of COVID-19 illness directly from patients and caregivers. Methods: Two cross-sectional surveys were fielded to national nonprobability samples of U.S. adults in Fall 2023: a personal burden survey (adult sample) and a caregiver burden survey (child sample). Surveys collected data on care setting, visit duration including travel and wait time, and medical and non-medical out-of-pocket costs. After applying quality-based exclusion criteria, 409 adult sample and 52 child sample responses were analyzed. Results: Over 87% of respondents were insured. Median out-of-pocket medical costs per visit were low, ranging from $5 (emergency department) to $10 (urgent care) in the adult sample, and from $0 (emergency department) to $75 (hospitalization) in the child sample. Median non-medical costs were $28 or less across care settings. Median time spent receiving care ranged from 90 minutes (primary care, child sample) to 300 minutes (emergency department, adult sample). Despite the relatively low reported out-of-pocket costs, COVID-related financial challenges were reported by 34% of the adult sample and 29% of the child sample, with the most common difficulty being paying non-medical bills (11% and 15%, respectively). Twelve percent in both groups reported problems paying COVID-19-related medical bills. Conclusions: In this post-pandemic non-probability sample, individual out-of-pocket costs for COVID-19 illness were relatively modest. However, time burden was substantial and one-third of respondents reported financial hardship. These estimates, including non-medical and time burden not captured in administrative data, can support more robust economic evaluations of COVID-19 prevention and treatment interventions.

This paper examines the impact of Cancer Care Ontario's regionalization of lung cancer surgery on blood transfusion use for thoracic surgery at The Ottawa Hospital. Using aggregate data scraped from the paper ''Changing trends in blood transfusion: an analysis of 244,013 hospitalizations'' by Shehata et al. (2014) we estimated the effect regionalization on the log mean number of blood transfusions among thoracic surgeons (who treat lung cancer), utilizing other surgical specialties as controls. We found that the average number of blood transfusions increased significantly among thoracic surgeons following the opening of a new cancer care centre at the hospital in December 2009, while control specialties showed no parallel change. Contextualizing these results in a modified ''population level'' treatment threshold model, it is argued that the main driver of this increase in blood transfusions among thoracic surgeons was due to the influx of less skilled thoracic surgeons to The Ottawa Hospital, and the closing of thoracic surgery units at smaller hospitals which was part of the broader regionalization process.

Background/Aims This work aimed to estimate the annual tertiary healthcare and societal costs associated with paediatric congenital heart disease (CHD) in the United Kingdom using real-world data from a Level 1 cardiac surgical centre in the National Health Service (NHS). Methods A prevalence-based cost-of-illness analysis was conducted using patient-level inpatient and outpatient activity data from Evelina London Children's Hospital between 1 June 2023 and 31 May 2024. Costs were estimated from NHS and societal perspectives and extrapolated to national level using National Congenital Heart Disease Audit (NCHDA) procedural activity data. Healthcare costs included tertiary centre care costs. Societal costs included parental productivity losses and impacts on lifetime earnings for children. Deterministic sensitivity analysis explored parameter uncertainty. Results Approximately 9.6% of UK paediatric CHD procedures were undertaken at Evelina London Children's Hospital at a cost of {pound}15.0 million per annum, corresponding to a national estimate of {pound}156.4 million. Single-ventricle procedures accounted for 4.8% of inpatient activity but 19.4% of inpatient costs. Sensitivity analysis produced national healthcare cost estimates ranging from {pound}125.1 million to {pound}187.7 million. National productivity losses associated with parental absence from work were estimated at {pound}82.4 million annually. Individuals with CHD were estimated to experience a mean reduction in lifetime earnings of {pound}81,509. Conclusion Paediatric CHD imposes a substantial economic cost on the UK healthcare system and wider society. This study provides the first real-world national estimate of the economic impact of paediatric CHD in the UK and may inform future service planning, research investment, and innovation adoption strategies.

Background: People with severe mental illness (SMI) report poorer oral health outcomes than the general population, are less likely to attend regular dental check-ups, and may require additional support to visit a dentist. Our previous research showed that interventions tailored to their needs and support from the mental health care system are needed to improve oral health outcomes in people with SMI. Although there is some provision of urgent dental care for people with SMI, there are currently limited available interventions that integrate dental and mental health care and provide dental support in a mental healthcare setting. To address this gap, the aims of the SMILE project are to 1) co-develop and 2) test the feasibility and acceptability of an oral health intervention for people with SMI, delivered by mental health professionals in secondary community mental health care settings. This paper describes the protocol for the feasibility and acceptability testing of the SMILE intervention. Methods: This is a single-arm, non-randomised feasibility trial assessing the feasibility and acceptability of an intervention to support the oral health of mental healthcare service users with SMI. The intervention was co-produced with service users, carers, mental health and dental health professionals, and includes advice on maintaining good oral hygiene and lifestyle habits to maintain good oral health. The main aim of the study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of delivering the intervention, using quantitative data collected at baseline, three and six-month follow-up, and qualitative interviews with participants and mental health staff involved in delivering the intervention. Results: The study results will determine whether the intervention can be successfully delivered in secondary community mental health care settings and inform the most appropriate primary and secondary outcomes for a future trial. Conclusion: The findings of this study will inform the feasibility of progression to the pilot stage of a randomised controlled trial to assess the clinical and cost effectiveness of delivering an oral health intervention in a mental healthcare setting.

A. Rationale: Medication-related incidents are an important patient-safety concern, particularly in critical-care and inpatient settings where polypharmacy, clinical complexity, frequent therapeutic modifications, and transitions of care increase the risk of medication errors. Systematic analysis of reported incidents can help identify predominant error patterns, potential contributing factors, and priority areas for quality improvement. The present study was undertaken to characterize medication-related incidents and identify areas requiring targeted patient-safety interventions. B. Research Question What are the predominant patterns and distribution of medication-related incidents across critical-care and inpatient units, what patient-care, process, communication, documentation, and system-level factors potentially contribute to their occurrence, and how can these findings be systematically translated into prioritized, evidence-based quality-improvement interventions to strengthen medication safety and reduce preventable medication-related harm? C. Study Design and Methods A retrospective descriptive observational study was conducted to assess the pattern of medication-related errors identified through medication audits conducted in inpatient and critical-care settings. A total of 74 medication audit records were retrospectively reviewed. Each record was evaluated for the presence and type of medication-related error, including transcription, administration, documentation, and dispensing errors. The identified medication errors were categorized based on the nature of the error documented in the audit records. As individual records could contain more than one type of medication-related error, the error categories were considered non-mutually exclusive. Consequently, the total number of error occurrences could exceed the number of records reviewed. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed using frequency distributions and percentages to determine the relative occurrence of each medication-error category. Pareto analysis was subsequently performed to identify the predominant error categories and establish priorities for quality-improvement interventions. The Pareto analysis demonstrated that transcription and administration errors constituted the major contributors to the observed medication-related errors. The identified error patterns were further evaluated using a process-based patient-safety approach to determine potential failure points within the medication-use process. Poka-Yoke (error-proofing) principles were applied to identify opportunities for preventing or detecting errors at the point of occurrence. Based on the findings, potential interventions included standardization of medication-ordering and transcription processes, mandatory verification of medication details, strengthening of independent verification for high-alert medications, and incorporation of technology-enabled safeguards such as electronic medication administration records and barcode-based medication administration. The findings were used to identify priority areas for targeted quality-improvement interventions aimed at reducing medication-related errors and strengthening the safety and reliability of the medication-use process. D. Results: A total of 91 medication-related error occurrences were identified across the 74 audit records reviewed. Transcription errors constituted the predominant error category (46; 50.5%), followed by administration-related errors (41; 45.1%). Documentation-related and dispensing-related errors accounted for 3 (3.3%) and 1 (1.1%) occurrences, respectively. Pareto analysis demonstrated that transcription and administration-related errors collectively accounted for 87 of the 91 identified occurrences (95.6%), indicating a substantial concentration of medication-related errors within these two categories. The cumulative frequency increased from 50.5% for transcription errors to 95.6% following inclusion of administration-related errors, while the remaining categories contributed only 4.4% of the total error occurrences. Accordingly, transcription and administration-related errors were identified as the principal priority areas for subsequent root cause analysis and quality-improvement interventions. Interpretation: The findings demonstrate that transcription errors (50.5%) and administration-related errors (45.1%) were the predominant medication-related errors, collectively accounting for 87 of the 91 identified error occurrences (95.6%). Documentation-related errors constituted 3.3%, while dispensing-related errors accounted for 1.1% of the observed occurrences. Pareto analysis revealed a marked concentration of medication-related errors within the transcription and administration domains, indicating that these two categories represented the principal areas requiring focused quality-improvement interventions. Subsequent Root Cause Analysis (RCA) and Poka-Yoke-based error-proofing approaches were therefore directed toward identifying and mitigating process vulnerabilities within these high-frequency error domains. Keywords: Medication-related incidents, Medication errors, Patient safety, Critical care, Inpatient care, Medication transcription errors, Medication omission, Medication administration, Root Cause Analysis, Pareto analysis, Poka-Yoke, Error-proofing, Quality improvement, Medication safety, PDSA.

Objective. To identify antimicrobial stewardship targets by triangulating provider knowledge and practice, government-facility prescribing indicators and patient-reported treatment experience in three districts of Chhattisgarh, India. Methods. We analysed three independently sampled cross-sectional components: a provider survey (171 providers), a World Health Organization and International Network for Rational Use of Drugs assessment (600 encounters at 20 government facilities) and patient exit interviews (371 consultations). We used descriptive indicators and multivariable ordinal or binary logistic regression. Findings. Among providers, 149 of 163 (91.4%) recognized antimicrobial resistance, but 131 of 163 (80.4%) reported providing antibiotics for colds or sore throats to at least some patients. Guideline familiarity was not associated with less frequent provision (adjusted common odds ratio [aOR], 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-2.24; P=0.725). Government facilities prescribed antibiotics in 329 of 600 encounters (54.8%), with a facility range of 16.7-80.0%. In exit interviews, 131 of 142 informal-provider consultations (92.3%) involved a reported injection; informal providers accounted for 131 of 181 reported injections (72.4%). Clear or very clear instructions were associated with satisfaction (aOR: 13.66; 95% CI: 6.37-29.28; P<0.001). Conclusion. High awareness coexisted with frequent self-reported antibiotic provision, wide facility variation and sector-specific injection exposure. Stewardship programmes should diagnose local drivers before selecting interventions and prospectively evaluate adapted decision support, audit and feedback, independent drug information, informal-provider engagement and communication training.

Objective To evaluate the information quality, reliability, readability, and content deficits of ChatGPT, DeepSeek, and Doubao in answering frequently asked questions about bee stings. Methods Twenty-five high-frequency patient questions were selected based on Google Trends, domestic health platforms, and allergy guidelines, and submitted to the three LLMs, yielding 75 responses. Two emergency physicians independently assessed quality using GQS, mDISCERN, QAMAI, EQIP, and PEMAT-U/A. Readability was evaluated using six indices (ARI, FRES, GFI, FKGL, CLI, SMOG). Content deficits were classified qualitatively. Twenty emergency department patients evaluated the comprehensibility and credibility of AI responses. Results Significant differences were found among the three models on all quality metrics (all P < 0.01). DeepSeek achieved the highest mDISCERN score (median 21.00); ChatGPT led on QAMAI (25.00) and EQIP (75.00%); Doubao ranked lowest on all quality indicators but highest on PEMAT-U (73.00%). No model met the sixth-grade reading level standard. Eleven content deficits were identified: outdated medical advice (45.45%), omissions (36.36%), and hallucinations (18.18%). Doubao received the highest patient preference (45.0%). Conclusion The three LLMs exhibited distinct strengths: DeepSeek in source reliability, ChatGPT in overall quality, and Doubao in understandability. All models had excessively high readability levels, and outdated medical advice was the predominant content deficit. Objective To evaluate the information quality, reliability, readability, and content deficits of ChatGPT, DeepSeek, and Doubao in answering frequently asked questions about bee stings. Methods Twenty-five high-frequency patient questions were selected based on Google Trends, domestic health platforms, and allergy guidelines, and submitted to the three LLMs, yielding 75 responses. Two emergency physicians independently assessed quality using GQS, mDISCERN, QAMAI, EQIP, and PEMAT-U/A. Readability was evaluated using six indices (ARI, FRES, GFI, FKGL, CLI, SMOG). Content deficits were classified qualitatively. Twenty emergency department patients evaluated the comprehensibility and credibility of AI responses. Results Significant differences were found among the three models on all quality metrics (all P < 0.01). DeepSeek achieved the highest mDISCERN score (median 21.00); ChatGPT led on QAMAI (25.00) and EQIP (75.00%); Doubao ranked lowest on all quality indicators but highest on PEMAT-U (73.00%). No model met the sixth-grade reading level standard. Eleven content deficits were identified: outdated medical advice (45.45%), omissions (36.36%), and hallucinations (18.18%). Doubao received the highest patient preference (45.0%). Conclusion The three LLMs exhibited distinct strengths: DeepSeek in source reliability, ChatGPT in overall quality, and Doubao in understandability. All models had excessively high readability levels, and outdated medical advice was the predominant content deficit.

Background: Chronic pharmaceutical stock outs hinder Universal Health Coverage in Ethiopia. To address this, the Ministry of Health introduced the electronic Logistics Management Information System for inventory visibility and Auditable Pharmaceutical Transactions and Services for financial management. However, no national study has tested their combined impact. This study evaluated the individual and synergistic effects of electronic Logistics Management Information System and Auditable Pharmaceutical Transactions and Services on essential commodity availability across Ethiopian public healthcare facilities. Methods; We conducted a secondary analysis of the 2024/2025 Ethiopian Service Provision Assessment dataset utilizing 1245 public facilities nested within 125 clusters. The primary outcome was optimal essential commodity availability (zero stock outs and 100% tracer commodity presence). A two-level mixed-effects logistic regression model with an interaction term evaluated synergy, reporting Adjusted Odds Ratios with 95% Confidence Intervals. Results; Overall optimal availability was 54.2% (95% CI; 51.4%-57.0%). Implementation rates were 41.2% for eLMIS, 38.2% for APTS and 26.5% for dual implementation. Facilities using eLMIS alone (AOR = 2.15; 95% CI: 1.52-3.04) and APTS alone (AOR = 1.82; 95% CI; 1.28-2.58) showed higher security. Dual implementation showed a profound synergistic effect (AOR = 4.32; 95% CI; 3.25-5.74, p < 0.001). Positive predictors included functional cold chains (AOR = 2.08), qualified staffing (AOR = 1.68), hub proximity (AOR = 1.58) and urban settings (AOR = 1.95). The model explained 66.2% of regional variance. Conclusion; Dual implementation of electronic Logistics Management Information System and Auditable Pharmaceutical Transactions and Services creates a powerful synergistic impact on pharmaceutical availability. Synchronized national scale-up and cold chain investments are urgently needed to achieve supply chain resilience and Universal Health Coverage in Ethiopia.

Those leaving military service frequently present with complex psychosocial problems, but military veterans are often reluctant to engage with statutory healthcare provision. Specialist mental health services have recently been established in the UK to specifically support military veterans with their psychological and social wellbeing. We explored the treatment and support provided by the London branch of a military veterans mental health and wellbeing service (Op COURAGE) from the perspectives of the multidisciplinary service team and their partner organisations and collaborators. We conducted semi-structured interviews with multidisciplinary service staff and members of their partner organisations and external agencies. Qualitative data were analysed using framework analysis.?A total of 16 professionals participated in this study, comprising five service staff, eight collaborators and three partner agency participants. Five themes with subthemes were identified, including (1) blended networks, (2) staff inclusivity and sensitivity, (3) spectrum of psychosocial interventions and holistic support, (4) referral mechanisms, and (5) (in)visibility of the service and advertising. Our evaluation highlighted the advantages of a multidisciplinary team and collaborative partnerships to meet the psychosocial needs of veteran and their significant others. We have proposed that service improvement could include increasing advertisement about this specialist service, deepening knowledge about veterans among staff and further involving veterans and key stakeholders in service decisions.

Abstract: Background: Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) imposes a rising mortality and health system burden, with opioid related deaths increasing from 8,400 in 2000 to 110,037 in 2023. Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) reduce mortality and morbidity, yet only 25.1% of people with OUD are treated with these medications, and inpatient MOUD initiation is inconsistent. Inpatient and Emergency Department (ED) treatment initiation and connection to outpatient care is suboptimal, missing critical opportunities to engage at-risk populations during acute care visits. Our goals were to determine the proportion of patients with OUD treated with MOUD during a hospital/ED stay, and the proportion successfully connected to outpatient care. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients 18 years or older with an OUD diagnosis at Duke University Hospital and Duke Regional Hospital (7/1/2023 to 12/31/2025) who had an inpatient or ED encounter with an associated OUD diagnosis code. Primary outcomes were buprenorphine at discharge, 30-day acute care return, and 30 day outpatient follow up. Adjusted modified Poisson regression models with cluster robust standard errors evaluated associations with age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance, area deprivation index, encounter type, and comorbidity score. Results: Of 5,390 patients with OUD, 42.1% (2,267) had an acute care encounter, generating 3,893 encounters. Neither buprenorphine nor methadone was prescribed at discharge for 46.0% of encounters. Acute care return occurred in 33.6% and outpatient follow up in 32.2% of encounters within 30 days; only 7.4% of follow-ups included a buprenorphine prescription. ED encounters had lower discharge prescribing than inpatient encounters (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.61,0.86). Black patients had higher 30 day acute care return than White patients (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02,1.30) Conclusions: Acute care encounters represent repeated, missed opportunities for MOUD initiation. Disparities were concentrated in post-discharge return and follow up rather than at initial prescribing, and attrition occurred at each transition along the screening-treatment-referral pathway.

Background Pediatric neurocritical care (PNCC) has emerged as a distinct field, and many hospitals have moved to establishing dedicated PNCC programs. How practice change is implemented within these programs is not well understood. This study had two objectives. First, we sought to understand the barriers and facilitators of practice change in PNCC from the perspectives of the multiprofessional clinicians who deliver it. Second, we sought to characterize how well the integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) implementation determinant framework captures them. Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of clinicians involved in PNCC at three U.S. academic medical centers. The interview guide was developed using i-PARIHS to organize barriers and facilitators of practice change across the innovation, recipients, context, and facilitation constructs. We applied framework analysis, combining deductive i-PARIHS, study-specific, and inductively derived categories. Two coders independently indexed the transcripts and reconciled them to consensus, with first-author adjudication. Preliminary site-level findings were validated with participants. Results We interviewed 33 clinicians: 24 physicians, 7 nurses, and 2 advanced practice providers. Most determinants of practice change mapped to existing i-PARIHS constructs, but three were not adequately captured by the framework as currently specified. The most consequential was an interprofessional authority gradient that determined whose preferences prevailed when intensive care, neurology, and neurosurgery disagreed. The other two were clinician autonomy, which served as the lens through which the acceptability of a change was judged, and the affective state clinicians bring to practice change. Receptivity depended more on recipients' values, prior experience, and capacity to absorb change into a demanding workflow. Facilitation was variable, frequently under-resourced, and dependent on credibility across professional groups. We translated these findings into three propositions linked to implementation strategies and outcomes. Conclusions Participants attributed practice change in PNCC more to the recipients of change, the multiprofessional context, and the availability of facilitation than to the strength of evidence for a given practice. i-PARIHS captured most barriers and facilitators well but may be adapted in this setting. Credible, resourced, authority-sensitive facilitation may improve the prospects for sustained practice change as institutions develop PNCC programs.

Abstract Importance Patients with behavioral health presentations leave the emergency department (ED) before evaluation more often than other patients, but outcomes after leaving without being seen (LWBS) have not been described in this population. Objective To compare return visits, admission, and mortality after LWBS vs completed care among behavioral health ED episodes. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective episode-level cohort study used a multisystem deidentified electronic health record database of US health systems (data snapshot June 4, 2026). Participants were patients of all ages with an ED visit and same-day behavioral health diagnosis. Index visits (recorded January 26, 2001 to April 13, 2025) each opened a 30-day episode window; in-window were counted as outcomes, and patients could contribute episodes to either group. Data were analyzed in October 2026. Exposure LWBS (diagnosis code Z53.21 on a date with an ED encounter) vs completed care ending in discharge home. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was ED return visit within 7 days. Secondary outcomes were return visit within 3 and 30 days; admission on day 0, on days 1-7 (principal measure), and within 30 days; and all-cause death within 7 and 30 days, assessed among episodes from 2017 through 2023 using a verified death-record definition. Results The analysis included 1,305,812 episodes (12,248 LWBS; 1,293,564 completed care) from 525,490 patients; 666,930 episodes (51.1%) involved female patients and 66,733 (5.1%) involved patients younger than 18 years. Return visit within 7 days followed 24.5% of LWBS episodes vs 13.2% of completed-care episodes (risk ratio [RR], 1.86; 95% CI, 1.81-1.92), and admission on days 1-7 followed 17.1% vs 3.9% (RR, 4.41; 95% CI, 4.24-4.59). Among 2017-2023 episodes, 30-day mortality was 0.69% (70 of 10,141) after LWBS vs 0.32% (2,426 of 756,140) after completed care (RR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.70-2.73). Results were similar under alternative episode definitions. Conclusions and Relevance Among patients with behavioral health ED presentations, LWBS was followed by higher rates of return visits, admission, and short-term mortality than completed care. These unadjusted findings describe outcome burden, not causal effects, and highlight patients who leave as a target for rapid follow-up.

Background: A responsive and resilient health system that is informed by community needs and guided by evidence-based interventions is fundamental to delivering quality essential health services and achieving Universal Health Coverage (UHC) and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Ethiopia committed to improve access to and quality of essential health services through the Health Extension Program Optimization (HEPO) roadmap, which restructured primary healthcare facilities into three categories i.e., Basic Health Posts (BHPs), Comprehensive Health Posts (CHPs), and Health Extension Program units imbedded within Health Centers (HCs). However, evidence on the reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health (RMNCH) service availability and readiness of these restructured primary health-care facilities remains limited. Methods: This multi-region cross-sectional facility based study was conducted between December 2024 and February 2025. A structured questionnaire adapted from the World Health Organization Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) was used to measure service availability, general facility readiness, and RMNCH service-specific readiness using predefined domains and tracer items. Differences across facility types were assessed using Kruskal-Wallis or categorical association tests, with Benjamini-Hochberg adjustment for multiple comparisons. Multivariable linear regression estimated the adjusted differences in overall RMNCH readiness, controlling for region, urban-rural residence, and log-transformed catchment population, with robust standard errors clustered at woreda level. Results: A total of 305 primary health care facilities were assessed, including 107 BHPs (35.1%), 142 CHPs (46.6%), and 56 HCs (18.4%). Nearly all BHPs were located in rural settings (99.1%), compared with 86.6% of CHPs and 71.4% of HCs. The median general health facility readiness were increased significantly across facility levels, from 33.1% (IQR: 24.4-40.7) in BHPs to 62.9% (IQR: 54.1-71.4) in CHPs and 89.6% (IQR: 81.3-93.6) in HCs (p<0.001). And the median overall RMNCH service readiness was 67.9%, 77.8%, and 91.1% for BHPs, CHPs, and HCs, respectively (p<0.001). skilled Birth Attendance readiness was demonstrated the largest gap between facility types. Compared with CHPs, BHPs scored 9.9 percentage points lower in adjusted RMNCH service readiness (95% CI: -14.7 to -5.1; p<0.001), while HCs scored 8.7 points higher (95% CI: 1.7-15.8; p=0.015). Conclusions: The restructured primary healthcare facilities expanded access to essential services, particularly through CHPs, which occupy an intermediate position between BHPs and HCs through substantial expansion of RMNCH service packages for underserved communities. Nevertheless, significant gaps remain in staffing, infrastructure, commodities, diagnostics, and childbirth readiness. Future HEPO scale-up should prioritize strengthening childbirth-readiness packages and ensuring reliable supply chains for essential medicines and diagnostics.

Objectives: To analyse how contextual factors shape the delivery of routine Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI) services in the urban Mumbunda Health Zone, Democratic Republic of the Congo, from the perspective of head nurses. Design: Multiple case study conducted from May to June 2026. Setting: Seven health areas in the urban Mumbunda Health Zone, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Participants: Seven head nurses selected purposively; four participants took part in additional follow-up interviews. Methods: Semi-structured individual interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, with systematic within-case and cross-case comparisons. Findings were organised using the four contextual dimensions of Leichter's framework. Results: Nine subthemes and one cross-cutting theme were identified. Situational factors comprised population mobility, seasonality and time constraints that affected access to, and monitoring of, immunisation. Structural factors included peripheral governance, microplanning and information flows; functional staff availability; operational and logistical resources; and community organisation. Cultural factors included professional norms, variable uptake of EPI requirements, perceptions of vaccination and language-related influences on trust. Exogenous factors reflected dependence on decisions at health-zone level and on external resources, alongside the transfer of some routine costs to facilities and health workers. Across all four dimensions, participants described compensatory local adaptations that helped sustain service delivery despite these constraints. Conclusions: Strengthening routine immunisation requires participatory microplanning, predictable financing for routine operational costs and context-sensitive support for facility teams and community health workers. Policy should enable useful local adaptation while reducing reliance on health workers' personal resources to sustain day-to-day service delivery. Strengths and limitations of this study The multiple case design enabled systematic examination of similarities and differences within and across seven health areas in the same urban health zone. Follow-up interviews with four participants were used to clarify, elaborate and refine their accounts. Leichter's framework provided an explicit structure for analysing contextual factors while allowing a cross-cutting theme to emerge inductively. The findings reflect the perspectives of seven head nurses and do not directly represent those of other EPI stakeholders. Data were collected in a single health zone over a limited period, restricting examination of variation across settings and over time.

Background Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where the burden of injury is disproportionately high, and healthcare resources are often limited. Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) improve the consistency and quality of TBI care by shifting medical decision-making from individual judgement to evidence-based recommendations. The strong link between improved TBI outcomes and CPG adoption has largely been established in high-income country (HIC) hospital settings; evidence on implementing TBI CPGs in LMIC hospital settings is limited. Objective This study explored healthcare providers experiences to identify barriers and facilitators to implementing a TBI CPG in the Emergency Department (EMD) at Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center in Northern Tanzania, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research 2.0 (CFIR). Methods We conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews (IDIs) with doctors and nurses who regularly managed TBI patients at the EMD. We purposively sampled participants between June and August 2023. The research team analysed data using thematic content analysis guided by CFIR domains, developing codes and memos iteratively. Results 7 nurses and 8 doctors with an average of 5 years of experience caring for patients in the EMD completed in-person, in-depth interviews. Most providers reported frequent exposure to TBI cases and regular use of the CPG in routine clinical practice. However, not all participants reported consistent CPG use, highlighting variation in implementation among providers. Key facilitators included strong interprofessional teamwork, readily accessible guideline materials in clinical areas, availability of diagnostic imaging, and perceived improvements in patient outcomes. Barriers to consistent adherence included ICU bed shortages, limited operating theatre capacity, equipment and medication stock-outs, high patient volumes, staffing pressures, and a lack of structured refresher training or formal audit and feedback mechanisms. Variability in procedural confidence, particularly among less experienced providers, also affected implementation consistency. Conclusion Our findings show that a TBI CPG is well accepted and largely integrated into routine care among experienced providers. However, sustainability depends on strengthening training, mentorship, audit, and feedback systems for CPG use and on addressing system-level resource constraints. Institutional investment in capacity building is essential to ensure consistent and sustained CPG uptake in our setting.